India

India Rejects Third Party Involvement in Nepal Border Dispute Amid Prime Minister's Remarks

India's Ministry of External Affairs responded to Nepal PM Balendra Shah's comments on boundary issues, asserting that the matter is bilateral and does not involve third-party mediation. With approximately 98% of the India-Nepal boundary already demarcated, some segments remain unresolved. Shah's remarks, which suggested encroachments by both nations, drew criticism in Nepal, highlighting the sensitive nature of the border disputes. The ongoing dialogue between the two nations is crucial for maintaining diplomatic relations and addressing territorial integrity.

MBN India Reporter

MBN India Reporter

Jun 2, 2026

0 views
India Rejects Third Party Involvement in Nepal Border Dispute Amid Prime Minister's RemarksWire Service: IANS

Key Takeaways

  • India emphasizes no third-party role in border talks
  • 98% of India-Nepal boundary is demarcated
  • Nepal PM's remarks attract criticism from opposition

Just saw this news about India-Nepal border and things seem to be getting little bit tense . Apparently some comments from Nepal's Prime Minister Balendra Shah have caused a stir,and now India has given a very direct response.

Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal made it very clear during media briefing in New Delhi . He said there is "no role for any third party" in any talks about the border. Basically,this is between India and Nepal only.

And he also pointed out that almost 98% of boundary is already demarcated . The remaining parts are unresolved because of some issues like shifting Gandak River and some cross-border encroachment problems which are being mapped together.

And honestly,this is where things get tricky ah.

This whole thing started after PM Shah alleged that Nepal had encroached on Indian territory,without giving any specific details . Now he is facing backlash in his own country for these remarks. Opposition parties and analysts there are apparently not happy at all.

They are saying that such comments could undermine Nepal's own long-standing position in border disputes with India . It could hurt their negotiating power in future talks.

Few key things to note from this situation:

  • India says nearly 98% of border is marked,with some parts pending due to river shifts.
  • Nepal PM Balendra Shah made controversial claim that both nations have encroached on each other's land.
  • Nepal's own Foreign Ministry later clarified these remarks were about technical issues and something called "Fixed Boundary Principle".

But then Nepal's government tried to do some damage control . They said his remarks were just about some technical studies of border areas where people from one country are living on land that technically falls in other country's territory . This is because of that "Fixed Boundary Principle" in river areas.

It's just strange how one statement can create so much confusion and diplomatic tension . You have the PM saying one thing,then his own government has to clarify it,and India has to give a strong statement... just feels like a mess rn .

Wire Service: IANS
#India#Nepal#Balendra Shah#Ministry of External Affairs#boundary dispute#diplomatic relations#Gandak River#cross-border encroachment#Rabi Lamichhane#South Asia

Related Articles

Mumbai News - Latest Mumbai, Maharashtra & India News